Truth in IT
    • Sign In
    • Register
        • Videos
        • Channels
        • Pages
        • Galleries
        • News
        • Events
        • All
Truth in IT Truth in IT
  • Data Management ▼
    • Converged Infrastructure
    • DevOps
    • Networking
    • Storage
    • Virtualization
  • Cybersecurity ▼
    • Application Security
    • Backup & Recovery
    • Data Security
    • Identity & Access Management (IAM)
    • Zero Trust
    • Compliance & GRC
    • Endpoint Security
  • Cloud ▼
    • Hybrid Cloud
    • Private Cloud
    • Public Cloud
  • Webinar Library
  • TiPs
  • DRAW

CVE IDs vs Named Vulnerabilities: A Practitioner's View

Fortra
06/13/2026
0 (0%)
Share
  • Comments
  • Download
  • Transcript
Report Like Favorite
  • Share/Embed
  • Email
Link
Embed

Transcript


I prefer CVEs. I think CVEs are logical. They're assigned everywhere. It's the year and an identifier number. I like CVEs. Everybody's on the same page when you're talking CVE. When you start to get into named vulnerabilities, you start to confuse things a little bit more. You start to wonder, are they talking about a specific vulnerability? Are they talking about something that somebody else used that isn't a real, like, where did the name come from? And how valid is the name? I guess is what I'm trying to say. And the reality is that a lot of these big vulnerabilities are created by marketing teams to promote a vulnerability that a company has found. And so they are designed to create hype. And that hype isn't good in the vulnerability world. You want to operate based on fact. And you said it yourself, these make mainstream news. Whether or not that hype is valid, suddenly that's the thing that everyone wants you to focus on because it has been named. And for some reason in our minds, something that has been named is always going to be more important than something that hasn't been named. And I think that ends up causing a lot of problem when you consider how minor some of these vulnerabilities have been overall and how little impact they've actually had on the real world.

TL;DR

  • CVE identifiers provide logical, universally recognized vulnerability tracking with year-based numbering that ensures consistent communication across security teams
  • Named vulnerabilities often originate from marketing teams and create confusion about validity, scope, and whether they reference specific CVEs or broader concepts
  • Marketing-driven vulnerability names generate hype that distorts prioritization, causing organizations to overemphasize branded threats regardless of actual real-world impact

Summary

This brief discussion examines the debate between using standardized CVE identifiers versus marketing-driven vulnerability names. The speaker advocates for CVE IDs as the preferred method for vulnerability identification, citing their logical structure, universal adoption, and year-based numbering system that ensures consistent communication across security teams. In contrast, named vulnerabilities often introduce confusion about validity and scope, as many originate from marketing departments seeking to generate attention rather than from technical necessity. The speaker argues that this marketing-driven naming creates problematic hype that can distort prioritization decisions, causing organizations to focus disproportionately on branded vulnerabilities regardless of their actual real-world impact or severity compared to unnamed CVEs.

Chapters

0:00 - CVE vs Named Vulnerabilities
0:23 - Confusion from Named Vulnerabilities
0:48 - Marketing-Driven Hype Problem
1:16 - Psychological Impact of Naming

Key Quotes

0:14 "I like CVEs. Everybody's on the same page when you're talking CVE."
0:48 "A lot of these big vulnerabilities are created by marketing teams to promote a vulnerability that a company has found. And so they are designed to create hype."
1:16 "For some reason in our minds, something that has been named is always going to be more important than something that hasn't been named."

FAQ

Why are CVE IDs preferred over named vulnerabilities?

CVE IDs provide a standardized, logical identification system with year-based numbering that ensures everyone is discussing the same vulnerability. Named vulnerabilities can create confusion about validity, scope, and whether they reference specific CVEs or marketing concepts.


Categories:
  • » Data Protection
Channels:
News:
Events:
Tags:
  • Vulnerability Management
  • Best Practices
  • Security Operations
  • Threat Intelligence
  • vulnerability management
  • CVE identification
  • security marketing
  • vulnerability naming
  • threat prioritization
  • security communications
  • vulnerability hype
  • risk assessment
Show more Show less

Browse videos

  • Related
  • Featured
  • By date
  • Most viewed
  • Top rated
  •  

              Video's comments: CVE IDs vs Named Vulnerabilities: A Practitioner's View

              Upcoming Webinar Calendar

              • 06/17/2026
                12:00 PM
                06/17/2026
                Action1: The Remediation Gap: Vulnerability Management in the Age of AI
                https://www.truthinit.com/index.php/channel/2010/action1-the-remediation-gap-vulnerability-management-in-the-age-of-ai/
              • 06/23/2026
                01:00 PM
                06/23/2026
                The AI-Powered VMware Alternative
                https://www.truthinit.com/index.php/channel/2009/the-ai-powered-vmware-alternative/
              • 06/24/2026
                11:00 AM
                06/24/2026
                LATAM: Accelerating Insights on AI Through an Engaging Webinar Series
                https://www.truthinit.com/index.php/channel/2012/accelerating-insights-on-ai-through-an-engaging-webinar-series/
              • 06/25/2026
                01:00 PM
                06/25/2026
                Generative AI Security: Preventing AI from Becoming a Data Breach Multiplier
                https://www.truthinit.com/index.php/channel/1998/generative-ai-security-preventing-ai-from-becoming-a-data-breach-multiplier/
              • 07/01/2026
                04:00 AM
                07/01/2026
                Schutz von KI in Anwendungen, Agenten und APIs.
                https://www.truthinit.com/index.php/channel/2008/schutz-von-ki-in-anwendungen-agenten-und-apis/
              • 07/02/2026
                10:00 AM
                07/02/2026
                Resilience Insights from Hybrid Threats When the Cloud Faces Challenges
                https://www.truthinit.com/index.php/channel/2011/resilience-insights-from-hybrid-threats-when-the-cloud-faces-challenges/

              Upcoming Events

              • Jun
                17

                Action1: The Remediation Gap: Vulnerability Management in the Age of AI

                06/17/202612:00 PM ET
                • Jun
                  23

                  The AI-Powered VMware Alternative

                  06/23/202601:00 PM ET
                  • Jun
                    24

                    LATAM: Accelerating Insights on AI Through an Engaging Webinar Series

                    06/24/202611:00 AM ET
                    • Jun
                      25

                      Generative AI Security: Preventing AI from Becoming a Data Breach Multiplier

                      06/25/202601:00 PM ET
                      • Jul
                        01

                        Schutz von KI in Anwendungen, Agenten und APIs.

                        07/01/202604:00 AM ET
                        More events
                        Truth in IT
                        • Sponsor
                        • About Us
                        • Terms of Service
                        • Privacy Policy
                        • Contact Us
                        • Preference Management
                        Desktop version
                        Standard version